As a consequence of changes made to the real rules governing the Roman numeral system, introduced during the Middle Ages, nowadays the equivalent of 1999 when converted into Roman numerals are officially MCMXCIX which inhibits their ability to interact conducively with other numerals.
But there is historical evidence to suggest that the ancient Romans would have worked out the equivalent of 1999 on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and then abridged them logically to IMM (2000-1) in written format.
Indeed if we were to format MCMXCIX as M+CM+XC+IX they too would add up to IMM as follows:-
M+CM = CMM
CMM+XC = XMM
XMM+IX = IMM
QED by David Gambell
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
MCMXCIX
it would be november,MCMXCIX
15th November, 1999 is XV. XI. MCMXCIX in Roman numerals.
The Roman numerals for 07-01-1999 are VII-I-MCMXCIX.
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
MCMXCIX
it would be november,MCMXCIX
The Roman numerals for 07-01-1999 are VII-I-MCMXCIX.
15th November, 1999 is XV. XI. MCMXCIX in Roman numerals.
1999 = mcmxcix mcmxcix; m = 1000, cm = 900, xc = 90, ix = 9
MIM is an incorrect way of writing 1999 in roman numerals. 1999 should be written MCMXCIX.
XIX-V-MCMXCIX
III-V-MCMXCIX
November is 11 so XI-XX-MCMXCIX
MCMXCIX EDIT: A shorter way to write it is MIM
In today's notation of Roman numerals: XII-XXVIII-MCMXCIX But during Tthe Roman era the eqivalent of 1999 was probably written out simply as IMM (2000-1)