40+30+20+80=170
Rounding both numbers to the nearest ten it is about 80
Rounding to the nearest hundredth is more accurate.
Estimate by rounding to the nearest ten.​ Then, find the sum.221122plus+33554455​_​_The estimated sum is nothing.
In whole numbers, rounding to the nearest ten is better. And in decimals, rounding to the nearest hundreth is more accurate.
An estimate of 348 would typically be rounded to the nearest ten, hundred, or thousand depending on the level of precision needed. Rounding to the nearest ten would give an estimate of 350, rounding to the nearest hundred would give an estimate of 300, and rounding to the nearest thousand would give an estimate of 0.5. The choice of which rounding method to use would depend on the context in which the estimate is being used.
35 will be rounded up to 40 and 67 to 70 40 + 70 = 110
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
They both involve rounding numbers.
rounding this question to the nearest hundred, the answer is 0 rounding this question to the nearest ten, the answer is 40 the most specific i can get this answer is aproximately 37.0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0
If rounding to the nearest ten: 795 If rounding to the nearest hundred: 750
It is 412830 when rounded to the nearest ten
To the nearest tenth: 0.2 To the nearest ten: Zero