Want this question answered?
The reason for organizing, analyzing and classifying data is find out the data relates. The relationship between the elements of a data will form the basis of the information.
To integrate has two separate meanings. It might mean simply that different sets of data are put together. It can also refer to a mathematical process which is part of the calculus.
One reason I can think of why you might not be able to find the mean of numerical data would be if there were missing data points.
Lost data can not be regained. There may be techniques to infer the missing data from the rest of that data but it would be domain specific and you may not be able to derive meaningful statistics from such a data set.
rely
Unreliable means not guaranteed. In term of data communication unreliable stands when the delivery of data is unacknowledged.
Scientific data that has not been experimentally tested is unreliable.
cell phone data lagging
It is better than keeping unreliable data!
tcp/ip
The source is the main thing that makes data unreliable. For example: I asked Dave and Jack to get me the population of a town; Dave gets 300,000 and Jack gets 251,000. They both went to different sources and got different results.
Then the component will not work or will be unreliable.
Primary research data is generally considered to be reliable because it is collected first-hand by the researcher. However, the reliability of the data depends on several factors such as the methodology used, sample size, data collection techniques, and potential biases. Researchers should take steps to ensure the reliability of their primary research data through careful design, validation, and analysis.
There is no reason for volume to be any less reliable than any other measurement.
why the magnet change the data from diskette?state the reason.
Basically, data gaps and especially unreliable data (i.e. generated by the party with much at stake in their agent being declared safe enough to use).
Yes. Parmenides did not argue against the appearance of change; he argued against its reality. According to him, there are rational, logical reasons why change is impossible. Since change is impossible according to reason and since change is actual according to our senses, either our reason or our senses must be unreliable. Parmenides thought that our reason was reliable and that our senses are unreliable. .