Oh, dude, a zero question is like when you ask someone something, and they give you a big fat zero in response. It's like asking, "Hey, how was your day?" and getting back a blank stare. So, yeah, a zero question is basically a conversation killer.
This question has already been answered. Zero divided by zero is zero itself. It is NOT equal to two.
It is not zero so the question is based on a false assumption.
It is 1.92, exactly as in the question.
Zero is itself a digit so the question does not really make sense. However, the non-zero digits are older than zero. For example, consider the Roman number system which had no zero.
Undefined: You cannot divide by zero
Zero
This question has already been answered. Zero divided by zero is zero itself. It is NOT equal to two.
No. As a mathematical process, division by zero is not allowed. (for more on why, see the related question and link)
Question Hour comes first [11 am]. Then by noon Zero Hour begins.
Why am I wasting my time with such an obvious question? Multiplication Property of Zero! If you multiply anything by zero, the product is zero!
Not quite. Division by zero is not recognised as a mathematical process, so your question has in fact no meaning!
This question makes zero sense.
don`t get question.
Yes. Zero is a number. I don't know how that is a religious and/or spiritual question in any way.
The answer depends on the part of the question that is missing.
The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.
It is not zero so the question is based on a false assumption.