Oh, dude, a zero question is like when you ask someone something, and they give you a big fat zero in response. It's like asking, "Hey, how was your day?" and getting back a blank stare. So, yeah, a zero question is basically a conversation killer.
This question has already been answered. Zero divided by zero is zero itself. It is NOT equal to two.
It is not zero so the question is based on a false assumption.
Undefined: You cannot divide by zero
Zero is itself a digit so the question does not really make sense. However, the non-zero digits are older than zero. For example, consider the Roman number system which had no zero.
It is 1.92, exactly as in the question.
Zero
This question has already been answered. Zero divided by zero is zero itself. It is NOT equal to two.
No. As a mathematical process, division by zero is not allowed. (for more on why, see the related question and link)
Question Hour comes first [11 am]. Then by noon Zero Hour begins.
Well, honey, 5 can't go into 0 unless you want to break the laws of mathematics. You see, division by zero is a big no-no in the math world because it leads to all sorts of chaos and confusion. So, in short, 5 cannot go into 0 unless you're playing make-believe.
Why am I wasting my time with such an obvious question? Multiplication Property of Zero! If you multiply anything by zero, the product is zero!
Not quite. Division by zero is not recognised as a mathematical process, so your question has in fact no meaning!
Yes. Zero is a number. I don't know how that is a religious and/or spiritual question in any way.
The answer depends on the part of the question that is missing.
This question makes zero sense.
don`t get question.
The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.