0
What is an accepted statement of fact that is used to prove other statements?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you prove a right angle triangle?
You cannot prove "a right angle triangle". You may or may not be able to prove statements about right angled triangles but that will depend on the particular statement.
What elements are necessary for a geometric proof?
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
Is mathematics based on assumptions?
In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.
What kind of statements do you prove with geometric proof?
Theroems
To prove a statement by contradiction one begins by assuming the statement?
opposite
What statements describes geometric proof?
consists of a logical chain of steps supported by accepted truths.. Plato ;)
How do you prove a right angle triangle?
You cannot prove "a right angle triangle". You may or may not be able to prove statements about right angled triangles but that will depend on the particular statement.
What is difference in axiom and postulate?
Theorem: A Proven Statement. Postulate: An Accepted Statement without Proof. They mean similar things. A postulate is an unproven statement that is considered to be true; however a theorem is simply a statement that may be true or false, but only considered to be true if it has been proven.
How can you prove you had a gun that is stolen if you don't have any proof you owned a gun?
Photos of the gun, sworn statement, sworn statements by others.
What elements are necessary for a geometric proof?
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
Is mathematics based on assumptions?
In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.
Do you need bank statement when applying B1 B2 US visa?
YES, You may have to show the Bank Statements to prove that you are financially strong enough to afford the travel to US.
How do you write a directional statement for an essay?
Ask yourself how you are going to prove your thesis. 1. Your Directional statements should show your reader how you are going to prove your thesis. 2. Your Directional statements should correspond with the topic sentence of your body paragraphs(where you expand on your directional statements, staying focussed on the thesis) Forgive and forget. You can't expect to be forgiven by someone else if you can't forgive them.
How do you prove a statement by contradiction?
To prove by contradiction, you assume that an opposite assumption is true, then disprove the opposite statement.
What kind of statements do you prove with geometric proof?
Theroems
Why is the quantum theory accepted?
The same reason any other theory is accepted: it explains known observations and it makes predictions that are testable by experiment (and prove correct when tested).
Are all theories accepted or rejected?
No, not all theories are accepted or rejected. The acceptance or rejection of a theory depends on the evidence supporting it, how well it explains a phenomenon, and its ability to make accurate predictions. Some theories are widely accepted, while others may be rejected or revised based on new evidence or alternative explanations.
