No because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction
Yes because if need be it can also be expressed as a fraction.
0.015 = 15/1000 0.015 is already expressed as a decimal. If need it to be expressed as a fraction then yes, it will be 15/1000.
Yes because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction
yes they can, say .57867600005 can be expressed as - 26/-465, but is not lowest term, but I think you won't be faced with a decimal like that. Fractions can be so complicated that you have to find a special converter to make the correct expression and the answer on top may not be even correctly expressed, but all you need to know is all decimals can be expressed as a fraction.
I think if an allele "want" to be expressed, then it has to have a dominant allele. They don't need another recessive allele.
No because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction
No, because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction whereas irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions.
Yes because if need be it can also be expressed as a fraction.
Yes.
It is a dominant trait. You only need one gene of a dominant trait for that trait to be expressed. You need two copies of the recessive trait in order for the trait to be expressed.
0.015 = 15/1000 0.015 is already expressed as a decimal. If need it to be expressed as a fraction then yes, it will be 15/1000.
Yes because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction
Yes because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction
Dominant genes will always be expressed however recessive genes would need to be inherited from both parents
It is a rational number because if need be it can be expressed as a fraction
shoutout to you i need the same Q