One cycle, in a computer, takes a time that is the reciprocal of the computer's clock rate - that which is expressed in MHz, or - more commonly nowadays - in GHz. Example: if your computer has a clock rate of 3 GHz, the time for a single cycle is (1 / 3 billion) seconds, i.e., 1/3 of a nanosecond, or 333 picoseconds.
400-470 mhz = -70
5 MHz = 1 second divided by 5.000.000 4.77 MHz = 1 second divided by 4.770.000
1,000 KHz = 1 MHz
1GHz is the same as 1000MHz, so 8GHz is 8000MHz. Kilo = 1000 Mega = 1000*1000 Giga = 1000*1000*1000 Tera = 1000*1000*1000*1000 Peta = 1000*1000*1000*1000*1000 And so on.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
1.10 MHz is tremendously slower than 750 MHz. If you meant 1.10 GHz vs. 750 MHz, then yes, 1.10 GHz is faster than 750 MHz.
4.7 GHz. giga is higher than mega
MHz. 1000 MHz = 1 GHz.
250 mhz fo sure...
Gigahertz are faster than Megahertz In computer terms 1024 Megahertz would equal 1 Gigahertz. Therefor a Ghz is faster than a Mhz.
The obvious choice is 266mhz 3.0GHZ.. Still sounds slow for this age but it is faster than the 80 mhz 2.8 GHZ. The more MHZ and GHZ the faster and better the processer is. Hope this Helped! TheKmar10
There is about 1.04 GHz in 1066 MHz.
It takes exactly 1000 MHz to equal 1 GHz http://www.google.com/search?q=1+GHz+in+MHz&btnG
It isn't a GHz yet... you need 1024 MHz to make 1 Ghz
Assuming you are asking what has a shorter wavelength 1 Mhz or 1 Ghz, then the answer is 1 Ghz. But the way the question was phrased, Mhz or Ghz, well 1000 Mhz is = 1 GHz. Note that 1 hz is just 1 cycle/sec. 1 Mhz is 1,000,000 cycles/sec and 1 Ghz is 1,000,000,000 cycles/sec. So to fit 1000 cycles in one second (as compared to 1 cycle in a second) the cycles have to be shorter (faster up and down sinusoidal wave).
1 GHz = 1,000 MHz.