4987 m
Given that 4987 metres is a more precise unit of measurement than 5 kilometres, you could argue that it would take more skill to walk exactly 4987 metres than it would to cover an approximate measurement of 5 kilometres.
5011 m
yes, because if it was in km it would be 5.011km, which has more significant figures
3.10685596 milesAlgebraic Steps / Dimensional Analysis Formula5 km*100000 cm 1 km*1 in2.54 cm*1 mi63360 in=3.106855961 miDirect Conversion Formula 5 km*1 mi1.609344 km=3.106855961 mi
1000 km is more 1000 km = 100000 km
Yes because 8 km is about 5 miles
Five km is less than five miles. (Five km = 3.10685 miles)
5011m
In terms of numerical precision, 5 is more precise than 12,000 because it represents a single, exact value without ambiguity. The number 12,000 could imply a range of values or be rounded from a less precise measurement, while 5 is a whole number that conveys a specific quantity. Thus, in contexts where precision matters, the smaller number is often considered more precise.
way more! 600km is 600,000m
Since 1 km = 1,000 m, 2,000 = 2 km. So you have 5 km to 2 km (the same unit). Now you can write 5 km as the numerator since it is on the left of to, and 2 km as the denominator since it is on the right of to. Such as, 5 km/2 km (simplify) = 5/2
5/8 of 64 km = 40 km