it is the contraception of the pythagorus theorum, and it is no solution to the theory of the dog
it is the contraception of the pythagorus theorum, and it is no solution to the theory of the dog
Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.
Well, from what I rmeember, Similarity: Both are derived from an initial observation and hypothesis Difference: A law applies in many areas, a theory doesn't
A theory that has been tested, verified and universally accepted as being true can be called a law.
one of newtons theories are the cell theory.
Examples of scientific theories include:Newtonian Physics (The Laws of Gravitation and Motion)The Theory of Relativity (Theories of gravity itself, of space-time and of energy, studied on the large scale)Quantum Mechanics (The theoretical world of the very small)The Theory of Evolution (One way to explain the diversity of live on the planet)
The history of Charles Lyell is available in a wide variety of different books on his life. He created various scientific theories and was well regarded among the scientific community.
Over time, theories can do one of two things. They can either be proven wrong, or they can be considered as scientific law. A scientific law is merely a theory that has withstood the test of time.
Only one if the theory is correct and can stand up to scientific testing. The number of theories really means nothing other than it gives more ideas to test. You could have hundreds of theories and they could all be wrong.
Not scientific law because there are too many possibilities, no-one can tell for sure.
No one really knows. There are lots of unproven theories but no scientific proof.
The scientific method