0.74
Packing can be reduced if you plan the process of packing. You plan the way and the things that you need to pack so that you maximize the space and pack only the essential ones.
p = n x Mr / Vc x NAwhere n is the atoms/unit cell e.g. fcc packing n = 4 and for bcc packing n = 2Mr is the Atomic Mass in g/molVc is the volume/unit cell cm3 = a3 where a can be found by the radius of the atom and the packing used. e.g in bcc packing it is "a = 4r/1.732" . In Fcc packing it is "a= sin (4r)" or "a = cos (4r)"NA is avorgados constant, = 6.023 x1023
.74
The efficiency of packing of objects relies on the shape of the objects. There are two factors to take into account: empty space between objects (which cannot be avoided due to the object shape) and empty space around the outside of the objects and the packing container.
.74
0.74
Are you referring to the packing factor in Crystallography? This is the proportion of volume taken up by atoms compared to the total volume. See Wikipedia entry for Atomic Packing Factor
in some cases yes but only by a fraction
When it comes to that you just have to ask your A55 to verify 53X with yo dada
The plural of packing list is packing lists. As in "where are the packing lists?".
Pre- packing is packing before a trip or where ever you are going. =P
Assuming a packing fraction of 74%, it would be 1/0.74 = 1.35 cubic yards.
The junk food is crispy after packing because of airtight packing and it is not good for healthy.
It exists as stable crystals therefore packing fraction is very low and it can not accept the water molecules.
How is nasal packing removed after septoplasty
The atoms in a diamond crystal are in an arrangement called "cubic closest packing". As you might guess from the name, this packs the maximum amount of atoms in the minimum possible space, so diamonds are more dense than, say, graphite, which doesn't pack its atoms as closely together.