The area of Khirbet al-Malih is 19,000 square kilometers.
Khirbet Safa's population is 1,105.
The population of Khirbet al-Faras is 2,982.
The population of Khirbet al-Ghazaleh is 16,240.
Khirbet al-Malih's population is 206.
The population of Khirbet Abu Falah is 4,237.
Khirbet al-Deir's population is 1,564.
In July 2008 Israeli archaeologist Yossi Garfinkel discovered a ceramic shard at Khirbet Qeiyafa which he claimed may be the earliest Hebrew writing yet discovered, dating around 3000 years ago.
Sylvester John Saller has written: 'A revised catalogue of the ancient synagogues of the Holy Land' -- subject(s): Catalogs, Synagogues 'The town of Nebo (Khirbet el-Mekhayyat)' -- subject(s): Antiquities, Christian antiquities
Mt. Moriah is a rocky outcropping in Jerusalem just north of the ancient city of David where Abraham placed Isaac on the alter (Gen. 22:2,13); temple site (1 Chron.. 28:3-6); may be Khirbet Beth-Lejj.
Perhaps yes as it is seemingly more likely today than before. Just like any science of man, there is always 'trial and error' and the site thought to be Joshua's city of Ai was destroyed circa 2400-2300 and laid abandoned in the Middle to Late Bronze age. So this site usually associated with Joshua could not be the biblical site mentioned if you put any stock in the biblical account.Interestingly, a site under work since 1979 is revealing a strong candidate for Joshua's Ai. The name of the site is Khirbet el-Maqatir. Recently a fortress that dates to the time of Joshua has be dug up and there is evidence that it was burned by fire circa 1400 B.C., which is the time the Bible tells us in Joshua 8.On the surface everything in the area matches exactly with what we read in the Bible. There are details given about an ambush force being hidden on the west, a hill to the north, and various details that are given in Joshua 7 and 8 that match perfectly with this site and the area around it. The discovery team of archaeologist feel quite strongly that they have found the site of Joshua's Ai.As already mentioned, the name Ai means "the ruin" in Hebrew, and the Arabic name et-Tell site also means "the ruin" inferring this to be the origin of the name. It appears then that when this little fortress was built one kilometer to the west, that same name was applied.Not a unique tradition because there are other ruins in the area of the et-Tell site that have retained that same name, Ai, in the modern Arabic name - about a half-dozen or so other sites in the vicinity have maintained that name and were occupied in various periods. This then seems to be another major breakthrough giving evidence to support Joshua 7 and 8, as Jericho and Ai were the two problems that secular scholars always pointed to saying, "Oh, look, we've got the archaeology here that disproves the Bible. Therefore there was no conquest." Now this team believes they have solved those problems now. They have the evidence to show that, yes, there was a conquest. It is just a matter of time and acceptance by the community at large.
The earliest known inscription in Hebrew is the Khirbet Qeiyafa Inscription, from about the 11th century BCE.The oldest complete Hebrew document is the book of Genesis, called Bereshit (בראשית) in Hebrew. It's exact date is unknown. Jewish tradition places it at about 1280 BCE, whereas modern scholarship indicates it may have been an oral tradition until the time of King David, 1000 BCE.
The Hebrew language was written first. The earliest known inscription in Hebrew is the Khirbet Qeiyafa Inscription, from about the 11th century BCE. The earliest examples of written Arabic date back about 1700 years (the 3rd century CE).