48
As a general rule, factors cannot be larger than the number they are compared to. 384 is a multiple of 96. 96 is a factor of 384.
96 48,2 24,2,2 12,2,2,2 6,2,2,2,2 3,2,2,2,2,2
I think your question should be "Is 969 THOUSANDTHS (and not thousands) smaller than 96 hundredths" 969 thousandths = 969/1000 96 hundredths = 960 thousandths = 960/1000 Hence 969 thousandths is not smaller but greater tha 96 hundredths
NO but 96 is a factor of 192
Oh, dude, the highest common factor of 96 and 36 is 12. It's like the biggest number that can divide both 96 and 36 without leaving any remainder. So, yeah, 12 is the winner in this math showdown.
-118 is bigger than -214 by 96. It is because on negative number line a smaller number is bigger than the bigger one.
No. 96 is a multiple of 48. 48 is a factor of 96.
4 is indeed a factor of 96 since 4 x 24 = 96
32 is a factor of 96, but neither 32 nor 96 is prime.
3 is the greatest prime factor of 96.
1 + 2 = 3 which is a factor of 96 (32*3 = 96)
48 is a factor of 96, so all the factors of 48 (1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16,24,48) are common to 96 as well.