Best Answer

Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational Numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.

Q: What is the definition for rational and irrational?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.

A rational number is one that can be expressed as the ratio of two integers with the denominator not being zero. An irrational number is one that is not rational.

1,600 is the ratio of 1,600 to 1 . By definition, then, it's rational.

Yes, irrational numbers are never rational numbers because irrational numbers can't be expressed, by definition, as a fraction of two integers.

A rational number is one that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, the second of which is not zero. An irrational number is any real number that is not rational.

Related questions

Rational decisions are thought out with common sense, irrational are not.

Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.

Fractions are rational by definition.

There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.

A rational number is one that can be expressed as the ratio of two integers with the denominator not being zero. An irrational number is one that is not rational.

1,600 is the ratio of 1,600 to 1 . By definition, then, it's rational.

Yes, irrational numbers are never rational numbers because irrational numbers can't be expressed, by definition, as a fraction of two integers.

4.6 is rational.

No. Any fraction with integers in the numerator and in the denominator is, by definition, RATIONAL.

A rational number is one that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, the second of which is not zero. An irrational number is any real number that is not rational.

A rational number is one that can be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers (like a fraction). An irrational number is a real number that is not rational.

No, by the very definition of rational it can be a fraction with only integers. Common sense would suggest that since irrational means not rational that is impossible.