The answer depends on what the denominator has to be the same as!
19
A fraction with a denominator of 13 could be in its simplest form because 13 is a prime number and has only 1 and 13 as divisors. However not every fraction with a denominator of 13 is in its simplest form. see below.. 13/13 = 1/1 =1 39/13 = 3/1 =3
Since the numerator and denominator of this fraction have a GCF of 1, the proper fraction 13/100 is already expressed in its simplest form. An equivalent fraction would be 26/200.
Divide the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common factor to reduce to its lowest equivalent fraction. For example, 169/260=13/20 after dividing the numerator and the denominator by 13.
It's not. The improper fraction 26/13 is not in its simplest form.
13/100 As 13 is a prime number this fraction cannot be simplified (by division of the numerator and denominator) but equivalent fractions can be formed by multiplication. The smallest equivalent fraction is therefore 2 x 13/2 x 100 = 26/200
-13 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as -13/1 or, in the form of an improper fraction as -13 and 0/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
5/15
the fractional equivalent for 4 over 13 is 4/13 because the denominator, 13, is prime, so therefore, the fraction cannot be reduced any further
No because 13 Is not a common denominator so it would not count as simplest
the answer is 13 16 in fraction as 16 the denominator
In mixed number form you can have 13 7/10 In inproper fraction form you have 13 x the denominator 10 + the numerator 7 which is 130+7 = 137 keeping the originaly denominator, thus 137/10