area of the rectangle=l*b
therefore ans = tere liye ...... jannate sajau mei tere liye....
Given unchanging lengths of the sides, a triangle cannot change its shape. But given unchanging lengths of the sides of a rectangle, it can change its shape by some force by changing its angle measurements. If a 2d load were put on a rectangle, enough force could squish the rectangle into a parallelogram, whereas a triangle cannot change shape without changing the lengths of its sides or bending its sides out of shape (most likely into a curve).Given these properties, a rectangle can collapse its shape much more easily and is flimsy compared to a triangle.
The diameter of a rectangle is the same as its diagonal (angle in a semicircle is a right angle). So the diagonal forms a right angled triangle with the diagonal as the hypotenuse and two sides of the rectangle (a length and a breadth) forming the legs of the triangle. If the lengths of the sides of the rectangle are known, a simple application of Pythagoras's theorem given the measure of the diagonal.
A parallelogram or a rectangle would fit the given description
If you are only given the side lengths of a scalene triangle, it is impossible for you to find for the area, unless you are given more information... like the height of the triangle for example. If this is a right triangle you would like to find the area of, you can multiply the length of each leg with each other, and then divide that product by 2 to conclude the area of the triangle.
You'd have to know some relationship, formula, equation etc. among the angles and the lengths. There would be many relationships to choose from if the items you mention are the parts of a triangle, but if they are, you've kept it a secret.
Given unchanging lengths of the sides, a triangle cannot change its shape. But given unchanging lengths of the sides of a rectangle, it can change its shape by some force by changing its angle measurements. If a 2d load were put on a rectangle, enough force could squish the rectangle into a parallelogram, whereas a triangle cannot change shape without changing the lengths of its sides or bending its sides out of shape (most likely into a curve).Given these properties, a rectangle can collapse its shape much more easily and is flimsy compared to a triangle.
Heron created a formula to find the area of any triangle given three side lengths. It is known as Heron's Formula.
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
Assuming the lengths of the sides are given, then perimetrer = base + 2*leg If the sides are not given, then the answer will depend on what information is provided.
The diameter of a rectangle is the same as its diagonal (angle in a semicircle is a right angle). So the diagonal forms a right angled triangle with the diagonal as the hypotenuse and two sides of the rectangle (a length and a breadth) forming the legs of the triangle. If the lengths of the sides of the rectangle are known, a simple application of Pythagoras's theorem given the measure of the diagonal.
Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
you can fine the perimeter
There are not any following lengths in the question to compare. Using the sizes given, and Pythagorean Theorem, the Hypotenuse of the triangle is 36.76 - which will have to do!
L=sqr((1/2 a+b+c) * (s-a) * (s-b) * (s-c))
If you mean side lengths of 5, 4 and 1 then it is not possible to construct any triangle from the given dimensions.
No because the given lengths don't comply with Pythagoras' theorem for a right angle triangle.
No because the given sides do not comply with Pythagoras' theorem for a right angle triangle.