False.
No. For a right angle triangle, the sum of the squares of the shorter sides equals the square of the longer side (the hypotenuse): 22 + 62 = 40 72 = 49
Yes. One example would be an yes. One example would be an isosceles triangle with sides equal to 2,6 and 6. Another would be a right triangle with sides 1,6 and sq-root of 40 (approx 6.34)
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, for a triangle to exist, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. In this case, 20 + 20 is 40, which is equal to the third side length. So, no triangle here, just a straight line. Like, nice try, but not today.
An infinite number. All you need is any right triangle where the product of the lengths of the two legs is 40.
False.
No. For a right angle triangle, the sum of the squares of the shorter sides equals the square of the longer side (the hypotenuse): 22 + 62 = 40 72 = 49
Yes you can.
Yes because the given dimensions comply with Pythagoras' theorem for a right angle triangle.
False because it does not comply with Pythagoras' theorem.
Yes because they comply with Pythagoras' theorem for a right angle triangle
Yes. One example would be an yes. One example would be an isosceles triangle with sides equal to 2,6 and 6. Another would be a right triangle with sides 1,6 and sq-root of 40 (approx 6.34)
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, for a triangle to exist, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. In this case, 20 + 20 is 40, which is equal to the third side length. So, no triangle here, just a straight line. Like, nice try, but not today.
A right triangle with a hypotenuse of 40 inches and a side of 8 inches has a leg length of 39.19 inches so the shorter leg IS 8 inches.
An infinite number. All you need is any right triangle where the product of the lengths of the two legs is 40.
It is a scalene triangle with 3 sides of different lengths
40 metres.