29 11 1192, I think.
2002
2002 was a palindromic year if we have the format day/mo/yr 10/02/2001
It depends on the format of the date: 01/11/10 01/02/2010 2010/01/02
20th of march 2002, 20th of Jan 2002, 20th of feb 2002, 20th of April 2002, 20th of may 2002. Basically in 2002 the palindromic dates are 20th,any date, and 2002 .Same thing with 2003 (30th, any month, 2003). Hope this helps :)
The date 27-10-2000 written in Roman numerals is XXVII.X.MM
29/11/1192. When reversed it also reads 29/11/1192
2002
2002 was a palindromic year if we have the format day/mo/yr 10/02/2001
A palindrome reads the same both ways. The last palindromic year was 2002. the next palindromic year is 2112. However, the next palindromic date dd/mm/yyyy is 01/02/2010 (01022010)
It is palindromic. It reads the same forwards and backwards.
It depends on the format of the date: 01/11/10 01/02/2010 2010/01/02
"Stormbreaker," written by Anthony Horowitz, was first published in 2000.
28 04 2000 can be written as XXVIII.IV.MM
In the UK: 3 is the day, 1 is the month and 13 is the year AD.In America: 3 is the month, 1 is the day, 13 is the year.
20th of march 2002, 20th of Jan 2002, 20th of feb 2002, 20th of April 2002, 20th of may 2002. Basically in 2002 the palindromic dates are 20th,any date, and 2002 .Same thing with 2003 (30th, any month, 2003). Hope this helps :)
The date 27-10-2000 written in Roman numerals is XXVII.X.MM
On your birthday in any given year after 2000, add 37 to the year date and that will be your age on your birthday in that year. On any date prior to your birthday, you would of course be one year younger.