We see that we must find a number n such that it satisfies the condition:
n ≡ 0 (mod 2) ≡ 0 (mod 3) ≡ 0 (mod 9)
Since 9 is a multiple of 3, we can forget about the 0 (mod 3). Since 2 and 9 are relatively prime, the Chinese Remainder Theorem states that there indeed exists a number n such that it satisfies n ≡ 0 (mod 2) ≡ 0 (mod 9). Now let 2K represent some multiple of 2, and set it congruent to 0 (mod 9):
2K ≡ 0 (mod 9)
This is a particularly easy case; 2K would have to equal some multiple of 9 for it to satisfy this expression. Therefore, K = 9 and n must = 18c, where c is an arbitrary multiplier. This is your new modulus:
n ≡ 0 (mod 18)
Any n that satisfies this condition will also satisfy n ≡ 0 (mod 2) ≡ 0 (mod 3) ≡ 0 (mod 9).
The lowest common multiple of 2, 3, and 4, is 12.
the lowest common multiple of 2, 3 and 6 is 6.
2 and 3.* * * * *What???The lowest COMMON multiple is 72It is: 72
The lowest common multiple is 2*2*3*3*3*3 = 324
The lowest multiple of 3 and 8 is 3. This is not the lowest common multiple.
Well, darling, the lowest common multiple of 2, 3, 5, and 7 is 210. Why? Because that's the smallest number that all those little divas can divide into without any drama. So, there you have it, 210 is the winner of the "Lowest Common Multiple" pageant.
6
The LCM is: 6
It is: 30
It is: 6
The lowest common multiple of two numbers, a and bis the smallest number that is divisible by both a and b. There is no such thing as a lowest common multiple of a single number.In the case that this question is asking the lowest common multiple of 3 and 2, the answer is 6.
The factors of 264 are 2, 2, 2, 3, 11. The factors of 558 are 2, 3, 3, 31. Therefore, the lowest common multiple is the product of 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 11, 31 or 24552.