Involving or exhibiting symmetry; proportional in parts; having its parts in due proportion as to dimensions; as, a symmetrical body or building., Having the organs or parts of one side corresponding with those of the other; having the parts in two or more series of organs the same in number; exhibiting a symmetry. See Symmetry, 2., Having an equal number of parts in the successive circles of floral organs; -- said of flowers., Having a likeness in the form and size of floral organs of the same kind; regular., Having a common measure; commensurable., Having corresponding parts or relations.
It means it is not symmetrical. The two halves (horizontal or vertical) are not copies of each other.
Yes, faces are generally symmetrical, meaning that the left and right sides are similar in shape and size. However, perfect symmetry is rare in nature, and most faces have slight asymmetries.
Yes, tube sponges are radially symmetrical, meaning they are symmetric around a central axis. This symmetry allows them to filter water efficiently and capture food particles as they flow through their bodies.
Bilateral (meaning that it is symmetrical only is divided alone onle specific line. Radial symmetry means that the object can be symmetrical when divided along more that one different line.)
is a arrow symmetrical
No. Socks are not symmetrical.
Yes, it is symmetrical
No but an isosceles trapezoid is symmetrical.
Diatoms have radial symmetry, meaning they are symmetrical around a central axis or point.
A mug is generally symmetrical around its vertical axis, meaning that if you were to slice it down the middle from top to bottom, both halves would mirror each other. However, the handle often disrupts this symmetry, making the mug asymmetrical overall. Thus, while the body of the mug may be symmetrical, the presence of the handle introduces asymmetry.
Pentagons can be symmetrical, but are not always so.
No the white house is not symmetrical