It depends entirely on how the agreement or contract is written. Presumably gains are apportioned by agreement. Losses will be too. By and large with a "shares" system that happens automatically.
It would be more of a threat to group dynamics than a suicide risk factor. If a common shared symbol or celebrity vanished, then those who look up to that symbol who are already suicidal would be more likely to end it then. A cult following could be a risk factor in it being a group thing.
mood disorders
Working with POM QM and trying to determine the correct input data for a question. It goes something like this... $50K to spend Stock #1 = 12% return with a risk factor of 9 (1-10, 10 = highest) Stock #2 = 6% return with a risk factor of 4. Risk factor of the invest can not be more than 6. Trying to determine how data should be input to POM QM Thanks!
The risk factor is eliminated, that person will be protected from the disease by 34%.
Simply put, if a building needs 4 pillars to stay up and theirs a risk one might get knocked over, design in 6. You then have a safety factor.
A share is more of a risk than a bond.
Partnership
risk factor
what is the risk factor of the muscular system
who share the road with an impaired driver are at risk
A risk factor.
It would be more of a threat to group dynamics than a suicide risk factor. If a common shared symbol or celebrity vanished, then those who look up to that symbol who are already suicidal would be more likely to end it then. A cult following could be a risk factor in it being a group thing.
An intrisic risk factor is something you choose to do that may cause injury
controllable risk factors
Ultimately, heredity (genetics) is the greatest risk factor of them all. However, the greatest behavioral risk factor is smoking.
The more risk factors for a disease, the greater the chance of developing that disease.
I think antonyms for risk factor would include: buffer, barrier, or defense.