Parallel lines fits the given description.
No. There can be huge differences. Brighter stars at bigger distances will look as a weak star but as at a shorter distance.
Parallel
Please re-phrase.
No. All of the meridians merge in a single point at the poles.
because there are 4 bases and all are the same distance apart, which makes a square which is a diamond turned sideways.
Parallel lines are the same distance apart for all points along the line.
No. There can be huge differences. Brighter stars at bigger distances will look as a weak star but as at a shorter distance.
Parallel
Please re-phrase.
yes....O_o k12
yes....O_o k12
A sphere with radius 4/pi = 0.6366 cm will fit the bill - after a fashion. Four points, equidistant on the equator, along with a point at each pole. Of the 15 possible pairs, all will be 1 cm apart along the great circle apart from the 3 pairs of diametrically opposite points, which will be 2 cm apart. There is no way in which 6 points can be marked on any sphere so that each of the 15 pairs is the same distance apart.
No. All of the meridians merge in a single point at the poles.
No. They're farthest apart as they cross the equator, and they all come together at the north and south poles.
No because the distance between them are always changing. If you were trying to ask if the orbital paths of all the planets about the same distance apart then the answer is still no. The distance from each orbital path varies from each planet to the next. The orbital path of Neptune and Pluto cross one another so this also answers the question, no.
because there are 4 bases and all are the same distance apart, which makes a square which is a diamond turned sideways.
No lines are parallel to the Prime Meridian. All of the meridians of longitude are farthest apart at the equator, and all converge at the north and south poles. Parallel lines would be the same distance apart everywhere, and never meet.