This is a term often used of some of the people in political movements. These are those people who seem to be weakening or to be forgetting the original purpose of the movement or to be moving closer to the opposing side.
Revisionists are people who rewrite history to suit they're own beliefs. Which is usually to say that certain events in history we're not as Evil or genocidal as everyone makes them out to be
The scholars dismissed the new translation as eisegesis, intended to support the revisionists.
Revisionists....you doing history homework too lol
Revisionists....you doing history homework too lol
Revisionists....you doing history homework too lol
No. The reason is that the whole idea that history has simple, obvious, pious lessons for the future is mistaken.
They are generally referred to as Holocaust deniers but they like to call themselves revisionists or claim that they are writing real history.
The right to keep and bear arms. Some revisionists argue that this wasn't what was really meant, but they're, basically, wrong.
History, often told by those who conquer and later told by revisionists, is merely but probable history while improbable history is that which probably never even happened.
History, often told by those who conquer and later told by revisionists, is merely but probable history while improbable history is that which probably never even happened.
S.F Kissin has written: 'War and the Marxists' -- subject(s): War and society 'Communists, al revisionists now?' -- subject(s): Communist revisionism
Warren I. Cohen has written: 'The American revisionists' 'America's failing empire' -- subject(s): Foreign relations 'Profiles in humanity' 'East Asia at the Center' -- subject(s): Relations