1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
No. Integers are positive and negative whole numbers (…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, …). As there are an infinite number of negative integers as they approach negative infinity (the greatest negative integer being -1), there can be no smallest (negative) integer.
The sum of the smallest 15 positive integers is 120. The sum of the smallest 15 negative integers is -120.
Infinitely many in both cases.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
An integer is either positive (non-negative), or negative, or zero. There are no negative non-negative integers.
The smallest is -1
Non-positive integers are zero and the negative integers.
There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.
No. They are negative fractions, not integers.
Negative integers, zero and the positive integers, together form the set of integers.
You cannot. The sum of negative integers will be negative.