Best Answer

The difference between cubic numbers gets larger as you go up the scale, so we know that we are looking for the small end of the range. Let's take a small set of perfect cubes and play with it:

- 125, -64, -27, -8, -1, 0, 1, 8, 27, 64, 125

27 + -8 would give us 0 would give us 16. And that would be our best option. Note of course that -27 + 8 would also fit the bill, giving us -16.

Q: What is the smallest two-digit number that can be written as the sum of two different cubic numbers?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

25 is the sum of 9 and 16. (52 = 32 + 42)

simplest form

If we use numbers that can be written with only ones and zeros, then we're working with binary numbers. The largest binary number that can be written with seven bits is "127". When you remember to include 'zero', that makes a total of 128 different numbers. The sum of the (smallest + largest) is (0 + 127) = 127 The sum of the (second smallest + second largest) = (1 + 126) = 127 The sum of the (third smallest + third largest) = (2 + 125) = 127 Each sum built in this way is 127, and there are (half of 128) = 64 of them. So the sum of all 128 numbers is (64 times 127) = 8,128

66, LXVI.Improved answer:44, XLIV

There is no difference. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.

Related questions

25 is the sum of 9 and 16. (52 = 32 + 42)

simplest form

If we use numbers that can be written with only ones and zeros, then we're working with binary numbers. The largest binary number that can be written with seven bits is "127". When you remember to include 'zero', that makes a total of 128 different numbers. The sum of the (smallest + largest) is (0 + 127) = 127 The sum of the (second smallest + second largest) = (1 + 126) = 127 The sum of the (third smallest + third largest) = (2 + 125) = 127 Each sum built in this way is 127, and there are (half of 128) = 64 of them. So the sum of all 128 numbers is (64 times 127) = 8,128

66, LXVI.Improved answer:44, XLIV

Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.

No. Negative numbers form a set of numbers. Numbers written as decimals is a notation for writing numbers. Different things.Negative numbers can be written as decimals, fractions, complex numbers, etc.Numbers written as decimals can be either negative numbers, zero, or positive numbers. They can also be integer numbers or real numbers.

There is no difference. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.

110

Arithmetic can be written as two different products of prime numbers. haha

3x3 9x1

3x3 9x1

6.