It is: p > 100
12, 24, and 60 :P
p is greater than or equal to 4.
No probability can be greater than 1. An event will either not happen (p=0) or it will happen (p=1) or something in between (p>0 and p<1).
No, because 0.21 is greater than 0.2
I'm assuming the question should read n greater than 10 and less than 100 and there are 8 numbers that satisfy this,1223344556677889So the answer is dhttp://www.webanswers.com/share-question.cfm?q=how-many-integers-n-greater-than-and-less-than-100-are-there-such-that-if-the-digits-of-n-are-the-is-1379ff| http://www.webanswers.com/answer/1566078/education/how-many-integers-n-greater-than-and-less-than-100-are-there-such-that-if-the-digits-of-n-are-the-is-1379ff| http://www.webanswers.com/report-abuse.cfm?q=how-many-integers-n-greater-than-and-less-than-100-are-there-such-that-if-the-digits-of-n-are-the-is-1379ff&p=1566078
To find out how many times greater 8 is than 8p, you can divide 8 by 8p. This results in ( \frac{8}{8p} = \frac{1}{p} ). Therefore, 8 is ( \frac{1}{p} ) times greater than 8p, which means it depends on the value of p. If p is positive, 8 is greater than 8p when p is less than 1, and vice versa.
Yes
To determine if .032 is less than p, you need to know the value of p. If p is greater than .032, then yes, .032 is less than p. If p is equal to or less than .032, then the statement is false.
Neither.
It is greater.
P (perimeter of a rectangle) = 2*l+2*w 2*24+2*w > 100 2*w > 52 w > 26 Any width greater than 26cm will cause the perimeter to be greater than 100cm.
It is an inequality than can be solved for p: 5 ≥ p - 3 → p - 3 ≤ 5 → p ≤ 8 So any value less than, or equal to, 8 will do for p.