By the remainder theorem, if the remainder, on division by (x - 3) is 17
then substituting x - 3 = 0 or, equivalently, x = 3 will give a value of 17 in the original expression.
Thus
33 - 3*32 + 3n + 5 = 17
So that 3n + 5 = 17
that is 3n = 12 or n = 4
_______________________
I do not see how this question can be answered when there are two unknown variables.
It is suggested above the answer is that n equals 4.
Let me substitute a random value for x.
x = 2
Would give:
(8 - 12 + 8 + 5) / (2 - 3)
= 9 / -1 = -9. There is no remainder. The remainder can not simultaneously be 0 and 17. There is an error here. (See below for why).
This question can not be answered when there are 2 unknowns.
Additional Information:-
The first answer is correct and the second answer given by another contributor is incorrect because by using the remainder theorem:-
f(x) = x3-3x2+nx+5 remainder 17
f(x) becomes f(3) because the divisor is x-3 and 3-3 = 0
f(3) = 33-3(3)2+3n+5 = 17
f(3) = 3n+5 = 17
f(3) = 3n = 17-5
f(3) = 3n = 12
f(3) = n = 4
So the value of n in the expression is 4 which makes the original answer correct.
3
It is an integer which, when divided by 2, leaves a remainder of 1.
2
209
A number leaves reminder 6 when divided by 10. What is the remainder when the number is divided by 5? Justify your reasoning.
26
5
5.2
799
11
It is a factor of that number and leaves no remainder
85. A number when divided by 238, leaves a remainder 79. What will be the remainder when the number is divided bv 17 ? (1) 8 (2) 9 (3) 10 @) 11