answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

x-coordinate on y axis is 0

User Avatar

Emma Goldner

Lvl 9
1y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the y-coordinate for a point on the x-axis?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which point is not located on the xaxis or the yaxis of a coordinate grid?

Which point is not located on the xaxis or the yaxis of a coordinate grid?Read more:Which_point_is_not_located_on_the_xaxis_or_the_yaxis_of_a_coordinate_grid


What is the value of the coordinate of every point on the xaxis?

It is called the ordinate.


When your independent variable is plotted on the xaxis and the dependent variable is plotted on the yaxis?

.... then your graph is inverted.


The first number in an ordered pair is always called the ycoordinate and the second number is always called the xcoordinate?

This is a statement; it is not a question.


To design a building which type of moment of inertia you use about xaxis about yaxis or polar moment of inertia?

We use y_y axes


Nouns starting with x?

xylophone, X-man, Xanax, Xanadu, xanthan,Xavier, xaxis, xenia, xenobiotic, Xia, xenon, xerophagy, xunit, xylem, xyst, to name a few


Who are the main characters in the book the winter knight?

The main characters of The Winter Knights by Paul Stewart are Quintinius Verginix, Maris Pallitax, Vilnix, Phin, Raffix Emilius, Mans, Stope, Hax Vostillix, Daxiel Xaxis, and Dengreeve Yellowtusk.


Is bang a point in table tennis?

point is a point but point is a point


Is inflection point the saddle point?

An inflection point is not a saddle point, but a saddle point is an inflection point. To be precise, a saddle point is both a stationary point and an inflection point. An inflection point is a point at which the curvature changes sign, so it is not necessary to be a stationary point.


Who says 'the point the point the point the point'?

the seamster


When do you use the word point-by-point in a sentence?

She went point-by-point in the lecture. He highlighted the formula point-by-point.


What is the point if the point is nothing?

If the point is nothing, then... Nothing is the point! (There is no point?) I'm confused