It is the equivalent of 1767
The number 2009 is already written in Arabic numerals.
27, in Arabic numerals.
Nowadays we think that the equivalent of 9 in Roman numerals is only IX whereas in fact IX is an abridged version of VIIII in ancient Roman numerals thus facilitating the conversion and calculations of the given Hindu-Arabic numerals into Roman numerals in several ways as follows:- MDCCLXVII+VIIII = MDCCLXXVI => 1767+9 = 1776 MDCCLXVII+IX = MDCCLXXVI => 1767+(-1+10) = 1776 MDCCLXVII-VIIII = MDCCLVIII => 1767-9 = 1758 MDCCLXVII-IX = MDCCLVIII => 1767-(-1+10) = 1758 Note that in mathematics that -(-1+10) is equivalent to +1-10 and so -(-I+X) is equivalent to -VIIII
CLV in Arabic numerals is 155.
The Hindu Arabic numerals are the number digits we use today. These consist of 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,and 9.
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 341 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
The Roman numeral of XXII is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 22
The Hindu Arabic numerals are the number digits we use today. These consist of 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,and 9.
The Hindu Arabic numerals are the number digits we use today. These consist of 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,and 9.
That is 29.
There is no system called "Arabic numbers". XII can be defined by a set of Arabic NUMERALS, but not by a single character.Improved Answer:-The Roman numerals of XII equals 12 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
The Hindu Arabic number system was in fact started by Indians, back then known as Brahmi Numerals. They then slowly evolved to become Hindu Arabic numerals.