its not the equation that matters it is how you map it out on the graph, the vertical and horizontal axis are interchangeable. For example if x is the vertical axis and y is the horizontal axis the graph would look different than if y was the vertical axis and x was the horizontal axis. The narrow and wide of a graph depend on the horizontal axis ( how quickly the numbers increase and or how far apart the markers are spaced) ...If the intervals are counted by 5 the graph would be wider than if the intervals were counted by 500.
Then that part of the graph is below the x-axis.
The equation 0 equals 0 is an identity and contributes absolutely nothing to the part of the graph that you should shade or not. The tautological statement can be ignored.
No, it is part of the solution set.
A cluster in a line graph is the major part of the line graph that connects to the plot.
Each part of an equation or an expression is called a term.
Then that part of the graph is below the x-axis.
The equation 0 equals 0 is an identity and contributes absolutely nothing to the part of the graph that you should shade or not. The tautological statement can be ignored.
A linear equation
-3
CiRcLe GrApH!
No, it is part of the solution set.
the x-axies
If they things you are comparing part of a whole, pie graph. If not, bar graph.
A cluster in a line graph is the major part of the line graph that connects to the plot.
It is the legend or key.
Each part of an equation or an expression is called a term.
It is somewhat subjective what the most important part of a graph is. It is very important that you label each axis.