The equation 0 equals 0 is an identity and contributes absolutely nothing to the part of the graph that you should shade or not. The tautological statement can be ignored.
No, y=8 is a fixed value. A linear equation would look something like y=x+8 - That would produce a straight line graph if the values of x & y were plotted against each other on a graph.
So, if we see the basic equation y=mx+b, we see that m=2, and b=1. If you look closely, this is basic rotation and translation of the original graph. First, I would translate the "mother graph" (y=mx) and then translate one up. Then, we would rotate the graph to the right two units.
Assuming you meant y=x2 & y=x2-4 They are both straight-line graphs, however - they produce different results. Using the values of 1,2,3,4 & 5 for x (as an example)... In the first equation, the value of y would be 1,4,8,16 & 25 In the second equation, y would be -3,0,4,12 & 21
The graph of an equation is all of the answers that are true for the equation. A variable is an unknown number in an equation. Most equations are written with x and y variables. There are an unlimited amount of numbers that the variables can be to have the equation be true, so you would graph the equation to show the unlimited amount of numbers that make the equation true.
This would be a more meaningful statement if it said that the y intercept of the equation equals 2, which would mean that when you draw the equation on a graph, the line intersects the y axis at 2, or in other words, when x = 0, y = 2. However, as stated, x = 2 has no y intercept. If you graph it, that is just a verticle line located at 2 on the x axis.
Move 3 over the right side of the equation so the equation would be x = -3. The graph of this would be a verticle line at x= -3
The equation you have given, y + 2 = 7, does not describe a line, it describes the number 5. You would not graph a single number, there is nothing to graph.
Since y=14x is a perfect linear relation, the correlation would be 1.
No, y=8 is a fixed value. A linear equation would look something like y=x+8 - That would produce a straight line graph if the values of x & y were plotted against each other on a graph.
So, if we see the basic equation y=mx+b, we see that m=2, and b=1. If you look closely, this is basic rotation and translation of the original graph. First, I would translate the "mother graph" (y=mx) and then translate one up. Then, we would rotate the graph to the right two units.
That would be a linear equation.
No. If you graph it, it doesn't. No line is horizontal unless the equation is y=A, where A is any real number.
You would draw a straight horizontal line through the 5 on the y axis.
x + y = 5y = -x + 5The graph is a straight line, with [ slope = -1 ], passing through the point [ y = 5 ] on the y-axis.
Assuming you meant y=x2 & y=x2-4 They are both straight-line graphs, however - they produce different results. Using the values of 1,2,3,4 & 5 for x (as an example)... In the first equation, the value of y would be 1,4,8,16 & 25 In the second equation, y would be -3,0,4,12 & 21
The graph of an equation is all of the answers that are true for the equation. A variable is an unknown number in an equation. Most equations are written with x and y variables. There are an unlimited amount of numbers that the variables can be to have the equation be true, so you would graph the equation to show the unlimited amount of numbers that make the equation true.
This is slightly out of context but you will have an equation of a graph we call it x and y because they are the axises we use on a graph. Usually in an equation we try to find the value of y. An equation that works in this case is y=x-7 but there are many others. But if we use the example i have given when x=16 this means y=16-7 which is 9 if you were to plot this point on a graph it would be 16 across the x axis and 9 up Hope this helps