51
Yes, if "capacity" refers to the shareholder's ability to obtain information, consultation, and to determine which way he or she will vote. That is, the capacity to make a decision should not depend upon number of shares.Obviously, a majority shareholder has greater "voting power", because most corporations allocate votes according to number of shares of a particular class of stock.
A closely held corporation would be a shareholder wealth maximizer because owners are invested in their company. They may make decisions that increase their profits.
If the shareholder is able to align enough shareholders that wish to shut the business down, it can be done. However, the shareholders must have 51% of the shares available to make this happen.
No, if the value of a share goes below what a shareholder paid for it, the shareholder makes a loss. They would only make money if the value of the share increases above what they paid for it, allowing them to sell it at a profit. A decrease in share value results in a loss for the shareholder.
This question cannot be answered because it does not have enough details. In order for me to tell you have much you will make in a month been a 50% shareholder you will have to tell me how much the company makes in a year.
Not all, but many (a majority) would eat chicken. Vegetarians do not make a majority in Hinduism, that is a myth.
Not all, but many (a majority) would eat chicken. Vegetarians do not make a majority in hinduism, that is a myth.
At six percent, you would make about $6000.
To make a number a percent, just multiply it by 100. So, this would be 237.5%.
270% move decimal two places to the right.
At six percent, you would make about $6000.
Generally no, unless the statutes, charter (organization papers) and bylaws permit it. Many states require 2/3 shareholder votes (super-majority) for specific corporate decisions, such as termination or the sale (or pledge) of substantially all of the capital assets of the corporation.