None. My picture is not about congruence or symmetry.
Objects are congruent if they are the same size and shape, or an exact reflection of one another. If objects are not congruent, they are dissimilar in either size, shape or both.
None that I can think of.
not many problems, only that you would get the problem wrong:)
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
That would be a rectangle.That would be a rectangle.That would be a rectangle.That would be a rectangle.
If the problem is (5x+1) and your trying to figure out X. The answer is 12. (APEX)
To provide an accurate answer about the background of the picture, I would need a description or context regarding the image in question. Please share details about the picture, such as its setting, objects, or people present, so I can assist you effectively.
Noise and flying objects would be a problem.
This shape would be a square.
The answer is no, if a rectangle's sides were congruent, it would be a square not a rectangle.
If they are completely mirror images, then it would be Perfect Symmetry, as long as both pieces are congruent.
Yes. That would make all sides congruent; in this case, your parallelogram would be a rhombus.