1 more than -3 is -2 which can be written as -2/1 in the rational form.
No, there are more irrational numbers between 1 and 2 than there are rational numbers.
No. A rational number is ANY number that can be represented as one integer over a second integer (which cannot be zero). There is no requirement that the top integer is less than the bottom integer (an improper fraction is still a rational number - all integers are rational numbers as they can be represented as an improper fraction with a 1 as the denominator). Only if both rational numbers are less than 1 will the result of multiplying them together be less than both of them. If one rational number is greater than 1 and the other less than 1, then the result of multiplying them together is greater than the number less than 1 and less than the number greater than 1. If both rational numbers are greater than 1, then the result of multiplying them together is greater than both of them.
130 is a rational number. A "rational" number is any number than can be expressed as a fraction or "ratio". 130 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction, such as 130/1.
-1 is a rational number
What's wrong with writing ' 100 ' ? It's a rational number, and represents itselfas clearly or more so than any other number I know of.100/1 is one possible way.
Here, the given rational number is 5 and it is also a whole number. It can also be expressed in fraction form as 5/1. We can determine all the whole numbers less than 5 as a rational number. Hence, 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the rational numbers less than 5.
A mixed number is either less than -1 or greater than +1.
-1
rational! :) Have a nice day!1
1
It is a rational number which when expressed as a fraction is 1/10
There are an infinite number of rational numbers that are greater than 7 but less than 8. Any fraction between those two numbers is a rational number, such as: 7 1/8, 7 1/4, 7 1/3, 7 1/2, or even numbers such as 7 4/784 or 7 452/453.