0
The earth is flat, when it is actually round,,,,. flat can also be round lay a coin flat and it can be round. the spinning oblate spheroid model is badly flawed under natural laws within science and psychics. fluid dynamics will explain. uncontained water will flow and seek level. bodies of contained water undisturbed will have a level surface. bodies of water could never stick uncontained to the exterior of a spinning oblate spheroid. there is no observable measurable curve to be measured according to the 8"per mile squared, fish eye lenses on go pro cameras can give this impression but have been proven wrong.
Newton's Laws of motion is also flawed dayton miller interferometer experiments proved motionless plane
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoIt's possible. However the definition of a law means it cannot be proven wrong. Whereas a theory can be.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between laws and theories?
Laws have been proven, theories have not
Why aren't the big bang theory and the steady state theory considered scientific laws?
They can't be proven with 100% scientific certainty. No one was there to witness the big bang, so we can't technically say that it definitely happened. And we wouldn't call the Steady State Theory a law, since it has been seriously discounted in recent decades. It is worth adding that when time honored theories become 'laws' it is not because they have be proven with 100% certainty. It is because they have survived the test of time and the test of many, many scientific challenges. Nothing can really be proven with 100% scientific certainty.
What is the comparison between scientific law and scientific theory?
A Scientific Law is a discriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under specified circumstances. A Scientific Theory is a well substantiated explaination of some aspect of the natural world that incoporates facts, laws, and tested hypotheses. Scientific laws are descriptive. They do not seek to explain phenomena, whereas scientific theories do.
Why have the laws of physic not been rewritten?
With each new discovery in Physics there is a small rewrite of the laws of Physics. The Scientific Method used by Physicists and others means that to make a major rewrite of the Laws of Physics would involve a major discovery in physics being proven by more than just the discoverer
In science what kind of ideas are generally accepted?
The most accepted form of scientific ideas are called laws. Laws are proven ideas that arise from multiple occurrences and inferences over a long time. Some laws include the Boyle's law and the laws of thermodynamics.
How would you distinguish a scientific theory from from a scientific law?
A scientific law is something that has been proved again and again under experimentation, and is always true. A scientific theory is an educated guess made based off of a group of data that is not proven to be true. For example, Newton's Laws are scientific laws since they have been proven to be always true. The theory of gravity is a scientific theory because gravity itself has not been completely proven to exist.
How do scientific theries differ from scientific laws?
Theories are observations held to be true based on their application to observation and proven scientific laws.
The difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law is that a scientific theory?
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
Can scientific laws be change by a vote?
No, it can not because, a scientific law is absolute.
What is the different between scientic theary and scientic law?
A scientific theory is something that has not been 100% proven to work in all situations. A scientific law or principle is a known principle that has been proven to work and affects all situations. There are special circumstances that take place in theory's and laws.
What is the difference Theories and Laws?
Laws have been proven, theories have not
What is the difference between laws and theories?
Laws have been proven, theories have not
Why aren't the big bang theory and the steady state theory considered scientific laws?
They can't be proven with 100% scientific certainty. No one was there to witness the big bang, so we can't technically say that it definitely happened. And we wouldn't call the Steady State Theory a law, since it has been seriously discounted in recent decades. It is worth adding that when time honored theories become 'laws' it is not because they have be proven with 100% certainty. It is because they have survived the test of time and the test of many, many scientific challenges. Nothing can really be proven with 100% scientific certainty.
Is a scientific hypothesis an absolutely unbreakable law of physics?
No. A hypothesis is a proposed statement in science. When a hypothesis is constantly proven and accepted by the scientific community, it becomes known as a theory. Even a theory is not a LAW of physics. The only laws that exist in science are those that can be proven through math. While unbreakable laws of physics exist, if it cannot be mathematically proven, a scientific hypothesis is not an unbreakable law of physics.
What is the comparison between scientific law and scientific theory?
A Scientific Law is a discriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under specified circumstances. A Scientific Theory is a well substantiated explaination of some aspect of the natural world that incoporates facts, laws, and tested hypotheses. Scientific laws are descriptive. They do not seek to explain phenomena, whereas scientific theories do.
Why is the word law used under certain circumstances and the term theory used in other equally important cases?
Laws are scientiffically proven facts while theories are not considered facts but are not completely disregarded either as they have not yet been proven to be wrong
What is the difference between a scientific law and a fact?
Scientific fact is sometimes wrong from The Bible's perspective Laws are sometimes wrong, as Martin Luther king once said "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." - MLK
