They were two theories that were used to predict the positions of the planets as they moved among the fixed stars. They both used planetary orbits based on combinations of circles and they were both pretty accurate. Ptolemy had the Earth at the centre while Copernicus had the Sun at the centre.
They were both replaced by Kepler's theory, published in 1609, which had elliptical orbits for the planets and also had the Sun at the centre.
Ptolemy thought the earth was the center of the solar system (Otherwise known as the Geocentric theory) and Copernicus's idea was that the sun was at the center of the solar system (Heliocentric theroy).
Ptolemy proposed a geocentric model, with Earth at the center and planets orbiting it. Copernicus suggested a heliocentric model, with the Sun at the center of the solar system. Galileo's telescopic observations supported the heliocentric model and provided evidence for Copernicus' theory.
Ptolemy thought the earth was the center of the solar system (Otherwise known as the Geocentric theory) and Copernicus's idea was that the sun was at the center of the solar system (Heliocentric theroy).
Yes, Copernicus' heliocentric model of the solar system, with the Sun at the center, provided more accurate predictions of planetary movements compared to Ptolemy's geocentric model, which had the Earth at the center. This was due to the simplicity and elegance of Copernicus' model, leading to a better understanding of the true nature of the solar system.
Ask not what Ptolemy thinks of his solar system, but what his solar system thinks of Ptolemy.
what evidence did ptolemy have for the solar system
The heliocentric model proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus contradicted Ptolemy's geocentric model. Copernicus suggested that the Sun, rather than the Earth, was at the center of the solar system.
Copernicus was the first to show, in a systematic and mathematical way, that a helio-centric solar system made astronomical observations easier to understand. Ptolemy's system worked (well, sort of) in explaining what we see, but it was incredibly complicated.
Copernicus was more accurate than Ptolemy in describing the motion of the planets around the Sun. Copernicus's heliocentric model provided a more accurate and simpler explanation for the movement of celestial bodies compared to Ptolemy's geocentric model, which placed Earth at the center of the universe.
Copernicus proposed a heliocentric model of the solar system where planets revolve around the Sun, providing a simpler and more accurate explanation for celestial motions compared to Ptolemy's geocentric model where planets were believed to orbit the Earth. Copernicus' model was more consistent with observed planetary movements and laid the foundation for modern astronomy.
Copernicus' model is simpler than Ptolemy's because it places the sun at the center of the solar system, with planets orbiting around it in nearly circular paths. This heliocentric model eliminates the need for complex epicycles, which Ptolemy used in his geocentric model to explain the retrograde motion of planets. Copernicus's model also provides a more elegant explanation for the observed movements of celestial bodies.
Copernicus and Galileo were two major figures whose ideas contradicted Ptolemy's geocentric model. Copernicus proposed a heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the solar system, while Galileo used observations through a telescope to support this view and challenge Ptolemaic beliefs.