0
What term best describe a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
The Latin phrase is "reductio ad absurdum", meaning reduction to absurdity. You assume the opposite and show that logically it leads to a contradiction and therefore cannot be true.
What else can I help you with?
Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the the opposite of what you want to prove?
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove.?
proof by contradiction
Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you what to prove?
Proof in which one assumes the opposite of what you have to prove is indirect proof. In indirect proof a person can draw a conclusion from assuming the opposite is true and then find a conclusion.
What term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you wan to prove?
Proof by contradiction (APEX)
To begin an indirect proof you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is true?
false
Which term best describe a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
The Latin phrase is "reductio ad absurdum", meaning reduction to absurdity. You assume the opposite and show that logically it leads to a contradiction and therefore cannot be true.
To begin an indirect proof you assume the opposite of what you attend to prove is true?
True. (apex)
Which term best describes in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
Contradiction or indirect proof.
What is True or false To begin an indirect proof you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is true?
It is true.
Is True or false to begin an indirect proof you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is true?
It is true.
To begin an indirect proof you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is true.?
Yes. It also called proof by "reduction ad absurdum".
