Want this question answered?
A conclusion based on evidence is called, well, a conclusion.It could also be a deduction or a syllogism, but that is unnecessarily high-falutin, so to speak.
A valid conclusion would be that a tautology is true.
You could conclude that B lies between A and C.
Getting lots and lots of results for say an experiment then deducing a conclusion from them, compared with doing just a few really precise measurements with a few accurate results and deducing your conclusion from that. The same principle could be applied to surveys etc. also
What you report depends a lot on what the data supports - i.e whether positive or negative reinforcement works better, and how well the data supports that conclusion (review how big the sample was, how likely that the conclusion is wrong, could the data have arisen randomly, as opposed to it being a true conclusion?). A general statistical analysis on the data should suffice, so long as the conclusion matches what you are reporting. (Always remember that correlation does not mean causation. E.g there are many doctors in areas of many ill people, but that does not mean that doctors are making people ill).
The Council of Trent was a pivotal event in the Catholic Church's history. If a certain conclusion was not reached, it could have had far-reaching implications for the future of Catholic doctrine and practices.
In the right context, yes they could. You could make an inquiry as part of doing some research.
In the right context, yes they could. You could make an inquiry as part of doing some research.
This question does not need scientific inquiry.
Yes, almost any question can be investigated though scientific inquiry.
I don't know how to make a sentence to this words scientific inquiry. Could you help me with this?
describe your stategies for reaching your goals
The historical Gadsen flag can be found online at Amazon, eBay, Ultimate Flags, and the NRA Store. An online inquiry will result in a myriad of shops that sell this bright yellow patriotic flag.
a friend claims that pea plants grow faster than corn plants could you investigate this idea through scientific inquiry
conclusion of directive principles of state policy
To challenge an author's conclusion as a historian, one could analyze the evidence provided in the work to assess its validity and reliability. Researching additional sources to gain a broader understanding of the topic and considering alternative interpretations could also help in challenging the author's conclusion. Engaging in scholarly debates and discussions within the historical community can provide different perspectives that may lead to a more nuanced critique of the author's argument.
No its not a conclusion for a debate but you could ask politics about it.