Straight line
horizontal.
The line would be going diagnley to the right
It would be anything other than a horizontal line.
A distance-versus-time graph for a moving object would typically show distance on the y-axis and time on the x-axis. The slope of the graph represents the speed of the object; a steeper slope indicates higher speed, while a horizontal line would indicate that the object is not moving. The area under the graph represents the total distance traveled by the object.
My interpretation is that the car and any motion, like the graph, do not exist.
The displacement vs. time graph would show a curve that is increasing in a positive direction, meaning that the object is moving forward. The slope of the graph would be positive, indicating that the object is speeding up.
If an object stops moving, the position-time graph will show a horizontal line at the position where the object stops. This indicates that the object is at rest at that specific position, with no change in its position over time.
the line would be going diagnley to the right . i am guessing you are talking about the question from the california physical science text book
Like a parabola. Not "like": it would be.
i would put different colors on the graph or i will put the sports on one side and the number of students who like that sport on the graph
You would use a broken bar graph, when grouping and gathering information. You would use straight, slanted, or vertical lines and showing points with dots. A broken bar graph is just like a line graph.
No.The displacement-time graph of a moving body can not be a straight line perpendicular to the time axis. A graph like that would indicate that the body moved with infinite speed, moved from one place to another in zero time, or occupied many different places at the same time. Considerable evidence has piled up which suggests that none of those things can happen.