Want this question answered?
The 1st step would be to give an example of the equation to be solved.
What role of operations that applies when you are solving an equation does not apply when your solving an inequality?"
When solving equations remember that whatever operations are performed on the LHS of the equation must be performed on its RHS to keep the equation in balance.
The difference is that first you have to understand the problem and translate it into an equation (or equations).
Eradicate the fractions.
The 1st step would be to give an example of the equation to be solved.
The first step not possible in solving an equation algebraically is not to provide an equation in the first place in which it appears to be so in this case.
What role of operations that applies when you are solving an equation does not apply when your solving an inequality?"
No because you always keep an equation in balance when solving it
When solving equations remember that whatever operations are performed on the LHS of the equation must be performed on its RHS to keep the equation in balance.
The wave speed equation proposes that: v = fw; where "v" is the wave's velocity, "f" is the wave's frequency, and "w" (more notably used as lambda) is the wave's wavelength. Manipulating the equation and solving for wavelength yields: w = v/f. Thus, if one knows both the velocity and frequency of a wave, he/she can divide velocity by frequency to determine the corresponding wave's wavelength.
The first step would be to find the equation that you are trying to solve!
It is the solution of the equation
The difference is that first you have to understand the problem and translate it into an equation (or equations).
Eradicate the fractions.
The 1st step would have been to show a particular quadratic equation in question.
Ask someone eles.