When comparing the cosmology of Copernicus with Ptolemy, Copernicus had provided a far
explanation for all the celestial motions.
Heliocentic Theory
In the European world, from the time of Aristotle to the time of Copernicus.
He was the first person in history to create a complete and general system, combining mathematics, physics, and cosmology.
Cosmology or astronomy are the scientific studies of the universe. Cosmology, is the study of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe. Astronomy is the study of celestial objects, the physics, chemistry, and evolution of such objects, and phenomena that originate outside the atmosphere of Earth.
False, TrueThe original spelling and grammar of your question is so poor that the answer could be either.Nicolaus Copernicus (his name should be capitalized) did formulate a heliocentric cosmology. He was not "the pearson" (sic!) but "a person". He was not the first either, many Greek philosophers prior to 200 BCE also held heliocentric beliefs.We can assume that Copernicus spoke with others about his ideas, we do know that the book stating these ideas was published just shortly before Copernicus died.
Charles Ginenthal has written: 'The electro-gravitic theory of celestial motion & cosmology' -- subject(s): Celestial mechanics, Gravitation, Cosmology
the first person to formulate a comprehensive heliocentric cosmology
Heliocentic Theory
In the European world, from the time of Aristotle to the time of Copernicus.
Copernicus was the first astronomer to come up with the idea of heliocentric cosmology (planets orbit the sun).
Astronomy, the study of celestial objects and the observable universe.Another Perspective:Cosmology, the study of the universe from its beginning to its projected end. While there is considerable overlap between the two, the difference lies in cosmology's interest and emphasis on causality and final disposition (fate) of the universe.
Nicolaus Copernicus was the first astronomer to formulate a scientifically-based heliocentric cosmology that displaced the Earth from the center of the universe. So yes I guess you can say he was a scientist.
James M. Lattis has written: 'Between Copernicus and Galileo' -- subject(s): Astronomy, Medieval, Cosmology, Medieval, Medieval Astronomy, Medieval Cosmology
He was the first astromoner to formulate a comprehensive heliocentric cosmology which displaced the earth from the center of the universe.
He was the first person in history to create a complete and general system, combining mathematics, physics, and cosmology.
Cosmology or astronomy are the scientific studies of the universe. Cosmology, is the study of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe. Astronomy is the study of celestial objects, the physics, chemistry, and evolution of such objects, and phenomena that originate outside the atmosphere of Earth.
Tolosani claimed Copernicus made his biggest error by using "inferior" fields of study to make statements about the "superior" fields. Copernicus used Math and Astronomy to postulate about Physics and Cosmology. Others used principles of Physics and Cosmology to determine principles of Math and Astronomy. Tolosani felt Copernicus was undermining the entire system of science. He said Copernicus fell into philosophical error because he was not knowledgeable in physics and logic. To him, anyone who did not know physics and logic would be unable to make a good astronomer, and not be able to tell truth from falsehood. A simpler answer: Copernicus thought the planets moved in circular orbits. Kepler later showed they move in elliptical orbits.