Want this question answered?
Given a positive charge the electric field lines are drawn starting from the charge and pointing radially outward, ending in principle at infinity, according to the electric field strength being proportional to the inverse square of distance. From the definition of electric field we know that the modulous of the electric field is greater for smaller distances from the field generating charge. Since the electric field lines point radially outward we consider the density of lines an indication of the strength of the electirc field. If we immagine to trace a circle around the electric field generating charge, of radius slightly greater than the radius of the object which holds the charge and therefore generates the electric field, such circle will be crossed by a number 'n' of lines. The density of lines crossing the cirle will then be the circumference of the circle divided by the number 'n' of lines. For a larger circle we will have a greater circumference, but same number of lines 'n', and therefore a smaller density of lines crossing it, which idicates a lower intesity of electric field for a greater distance from the charge.
range, field, area, reach, scope, limit, extent, boundary
less than (<) and greater than (>)
we need more information. If you were collecting something in a water bottle then three inches would be smaller then lets say a container full of 3 inches of water the size of a football field. Does this make since?
3ft = 1yd 1ft = (1/3)yd A foot is one third of a yard, therefore it is less than a yard in length. its less than... just think of a football field
hight power
The field of view is inversely related to the magnification power...the greater the magnification, the smaller the field of view
See the answer to "Why do you get a greater depth of field from a smaller aperture"There's also a great article on it at: http://www.uscoles.com/depthoffield.html
nothing because i dont know
Electrical field - to a large extent. Gravity - to a lesser extent.
Smaller receptive fields tend to have higher acuity and discriminative ability because they can differentiate finer details or stimuli within their range. Larger receptive fields typically have lower acuity and are more suited for detecting broader or global features.
Given a positive charge the electric field lines are drawn starting from the charge and pointing radially outward, ending in principle at infinity, according to the electric field strength being proportional to the inverse square of distance. From the definition of electric field we know that the modulous of the electric field is greater for smaller distances from the field generating charge. Since the electric field lines point radially outward we consider the density of lines an indication of the strength of the electirc field. If we immagine to trace a circle around the electric field generating charge, of radius slightly greater than the radius of the object which holds the charge and therefore generates the electric field, such circle will be crossed by a number 'n' of lines. The density of lines crossing the cirle will then be the circumference of the circle divided by the number 'n' of lines. For a larger circle we will have a greater circumference, but same number of lines 'n', and therefore a smaller density of lines crossing it, which idicates a lower intesity of electric field for a greater distance from the charge.
no No the greater the mass of any object the greater the gravitational field. Everything down to the finest speck of dust has a gravitational field.
The greater the mass of an object means it causes to have weight in a gravitational field.
The field of view becomes smaller when magnification increases.
range, field, area, reach, scope, limit, extent, boundary
Golf balls must weigh less than 45.93g and have a diameter greater than 42.67mm. A cricket ball has to weigh between 155.9g and 163g, and have a circumference between 22.4cm and 22.9. The cricket ball is bigger.