They are both infinite sets: they have countably infinite members and so have the same cardinality - Aleph-null.
If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.
D ko alam
All of the natural numbers.
Well, honey, the intersection of the set of whole numbers and the set of natural numbers is the set of all positive integers. In other words, it's the numbers that are both whole and natural, which means it starts from 1 and goes on forever. So, there you have it, the sassy math lesson of the day!
No. Natural numbers are a subset of whole numbers. Negative numbers are whole numbers but not natural.
0 and negative integers are all whole numbers but they are not natural numbers.
false, the set of natural numbers does not include 0, which can be considered a whole number.
Whole numbers and natural numbers are the exact same, except that whole numbers include zero
Whole numbers are the set of natural or counting numbers inclding zero
No, the set of natural numbers is a proper subset of the set of whole numbers.
The set of natural numbers is a subset of the set of whole numbers. The set of whole numbers is a subset of the set of integers. So the set of integers is the largest of these three sets.
Yes.