0
Which property would be useful in proving that the product of two rational numbers is always rational?
Jordynchan
The fact that the set of rational numbers is a mathematical Group.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What should be the next in the rational nos?
No idea what you're on about. If you are asking in what order do the sets of numbers apear in terms of proving there existence, I believe they are in the following order:N->Z->Q->R->CWhere: N is the set of natural numbers, i.e. whole numbers ranging from 1 to infinity.Z is the set or whole numbers including zero ranging from -infinity to +infinityQ is the set of rational numbers, i.e. the set of numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b where a and b are in Z with b not equal to 0.R is the set or real numbers, the collection of every rational and non rational number.C is the set of complex numbers, i.e. all numbers that can be expressed as a+biwhere a and b are in R and i is the squareroot of -1.
Is algebra in detective work?
Detectives have to prove their theories. Mathematics is one method of proving their case. Numbers don't lie.
Who proved that pi was irrational and when?
In 1761, Joseph Lambert proved that pi was irrational by basically proving that the tangent of some number x could be expressed as a particular continued fraction as a function of x. He then went on to show that if x was rational, the continued fraction must be irrational, and since the tangent of pi/4 was 1 (i.e. rational), then pi/4 and thus pi itself must not be rational.
Have been proving?
This is present perfect continuous. They have been proving themselves very helpful.
What is the relationship between prime numbers that is revealed by Shinichi Mochizuki of Kyoto University's proving the abc conjecture?
This is far outside my own field of knowledge. All I can do is to point you toward a secondary source.
What should be the next in the rational nos?
No idea what you're on about. If you are asking in what order do the sets of numbers apear in terms of proving there existence, I believe they are in the following order:N->Z->Q->R->CWhere: N is the set of natural numbers, i.e. whole numbers ranging from 1 to infinity.Z is the set or whole numbers including zero ranging from -infinity to +infinityQ is the set of rational numbers, i.e. the set of numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b where a and b are in Z with b not equal to 0.R is the set or real numbers, the collection of every rational and non rational number.C is the set of complex numbers, i.e. all numbers that can be expressed as a+biwhere a and b are in R and i is the squareroot of -1.
How Write the number 2.4 in the form using integers to show that it is a rational number.?
2.4 expressed as an improper fraction is 12/5 thus proving that it is a rational number
Is 0.131313 a rational number?
0.13131313 is a rational number, as it's a recurring number, and all recurring numbers are rational. To prove this, you first multiply by 10 until the decimal part of the number is the same. In this case, 0.13131313...x100=13.13131313.... Then you take off the original number 0.131313...x100 - 0.131313... = 13 Now you can simplify the left hand side 0.131313...x99=13 And divide both sides by 99, to get 0.131313....=13/99 So the original number can be expressed as 13/99, proving it's rational.
Is algebra in detective work?
Detectives have to prove their theories. Mathematics is one method of proving their case. Numbers don't lie.
What are adjacent prime numbers less than 100?
The first are 2 and 3. Proving that no others exist is left as an exercise for the reader.
Who proved that pi was irrational and when?
In 1761, Joseph Lambert proved that pi was irrational by basically proving that the tangent of some number x could be expressed as a particular continued fraction as a function of x. He then went on to show that if x was rational, the continued fraction must be irrational, and since the tangent of pi/4 was 1 (i.e. rational), then pi/4 and thus pi itself must not be rational.
What does the word contrapositive mean in math?
"contrapositive" refers to negating the terms of a statement and reversing the direction of inference. It is used in proofs. An example makes it easier to understand: "if A is an integer, then it is a rational number". The contrapositive would be "if A is not a rational number, then it cannot be an integer". The general form, then, given "if A, then B", is "if not B, then not A". Proving the contrapositive generally proves the original statement as well.
Ida B. Wells tried to fight lynching in the South by?
Proving the no victims were innocent
When was Packard Proving Grounds created?
Packard Proving Grounds was created in 1926.
Which is better Tony Hawk proving grounds or Tony Hawk underground?
I find Tony hawk proving ground to be better proving ground is way better
Have been proving?
This is present perfect continuous. They have been proving themselves very helpful.
What is the best theory to how the world began?
even when evolutionist rank higher in numbers, the creationist are well ahead explaining and proving most of their beliefes where evolutionist have many things unexplained.
