It depends on the size and mass of the rock. For a "normal" rock (as opposed to merely a stone) I suggest a crane with some means for measuring the rock's mass. A number of pulleys, each with a weighing machine should do the trick. Alternatively, you could use a weighbridge, if there is one in the vicinity.
To obtain its volume, you probably need a 3-d laser-profiling device. That should give the most precise measurement of its volume.
It is not; there are more precise measurements.
Radio-Telescope measurements are the most precise
2.5cm is the most precise measurement of the two measurements.
They depend on the design of the instrument.
No. A broken clock gives a very precise time, but most of the time it is wrong.
Generally, this term is called ACCURACY.
It is not; there are more precise measurements.
Radio-Telescope measurements are the most precise
yes...
It means they (the builders, or architects) possessed/had very precise(exact) measurements when they were constructing (building) the pyramids.
2.5cm is the most precise measurement of the two measurements.
They depend on the design of the instrument.
The measurements are not as precise as they could be because many peoples' response times are of the order of a tenth of a second. This makes it pointless to have a stopwatch recording times to a hundredth of a second.
No. A broken clock gives a very precise time, but most of the time it is wrong.
precise but unreliable.
Your calculations can be more precise, but the final result should be rounded, to avoid giving the impression that it is more exact than is justified by the measurements.
You could do it by saying that all your measurements were 10 centimetres - irrespective of what they actually were. That would be neither precise nor accurate but it sure would be consistent!