A square-based pyramid and a trapezoidal prism.
The shape would be impossible. The faces and vertices have to add up to two more than the edges.
Three faces, two edges and 0 vertices.
Three faces, two edges and 0 vertices.
There are two plane faces and a curved face, two edges and no vertices.
Conventionally, two faces, one edge and one vertex.
Three dimensional objects have edges, vertices and faces. A face is a plane surface which forms a boundary of the shape. Two faces meet along a line which is an edge. Three or more faces meet at a point which is a vertex.
One edge, no vertices and two faces.
You cannot have such a shape because either the shapes must meet at an edge or the vertices must be joined by an edge.
Cylinder * * * * * There is no convex 3-dimensional shape with these qualities. A cylinder has two plane faces plus a curved one, and two edges.
Triangular prism
Well, honey, that sounds like a hexagonal prism to me. It's got those six faces, six vertices, and ten edges, making it the life of the 3D shape party. So, go ahead and strut your stuff with that hexagonal prism knowledge!
A cylinder has 0 vertices. If an edge is defined by the meeting of two faces then there are two edges but if an edge is defined by the meeting of two PLANE faces then there are 0 edges.