The numbers are the first fourteen counting numbers in alphabetical order of their English names. It would not work in any other language, and works only for this set of numbers.
That said, the missing numbers are 4 (between 5 and 14) and 9 (between 14 and 1).
Dodging numbers may be missing numbers in a sequence. For example, the underscore in the following sequence represents such a number: 2, 4, _ , 8, 10.
The solution depends on how many numbers are missing and where they were. If there is only one, If it is between 4 and -5 then -0.5 If it is between -5 and -10 then -8 If it is between -10 and -16 then -13 Of course, the answer would be different if there were more than one number missing.
10 (between 7 and 13)
17. The numbers are being increased by odd numbers beginning with 3.
This sequence of numbers follows several different patterns. If you look at the first two numbers, 7 and 10, the difference between them is 3, which is the number that follows 10. The next two numbers, 6 and 12, are related by the number 2 because 6 times 2 is twelve. And the number that follows 6 and 12 is 2. The next two numbers are 9 and 7 which are also related by the number 2, except because 9 minus 7 is 2. Based on this, the missing number is 2.
The missing number is 34. The progressive difference between the numbers doubles: 4 + 2 = 6 6 + 4 = 10 10 + 8 = 18 18 + 16 = 34 34 + 32 = 66
7 6,7,8,9,10
Dart Board
This question cannot be answered for two main reasons. The first is that you have not specified where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to be. Clearly that makes a difference.Suppose you assume the missing number is the last in the sequence, then any number that you choose can be the next number. It is easy to find a rule based on a polynomial of order 6 such that the first six numbers are as listed in the question followed by the chosen next number. There are also non-polynomial solutions. Short of reading the mind of the person who posed the question, there is no way of determining which of the infinitely many solutions is the "correct" one. The same applies, wherever in the sequence the missing number was meant to be.
10
The missing number is 26. The number after 29 is 58.
342