They are brainwashed by their parents, priests and the media.
Modernists were open to interpreting religious texts in light of new scientific and historical knowledge, while fundamentalists adhered strictly to traditional interpretations and literal readings of religious texts. Modernists typically embraced change and adaptation in the face of new information, whereas fundamentalists viewed such changes as a threat to their core beliefs.
Fundamentalists often dislike anything that challenges or goes against their beliefs, including different religious views, scientific theories, or societal norms. They may resist change or progress that conflicts with their strict interpretation of religious texts or traditions.
Martin Pable has written: 'Remaining Catholic' 'Religious Vocation' 'Catholics and Fundamentalists'
no religious beliefs do not kill pandas only humans being ignorant do
Agnostic. Which means not to know. Or ignorant of.
1 Mormon polygamists/ fundamentalists 2 Islamic extremists These are only two, there are many others
No, because Religion is inherently irrational.
A secularist is a person that has a doctrine that rejects religion and religious considerations. A Fundamentalist is a person that has a doctrine based on strict religious considerations
Because it's "different" or " weird" or "freaky".
Careless, foolish, idiotic, stupid, ignorant, senseless, irrational, thoughtless, uneducated, or reckless. Those words are the opposite of wise.
The superlative of ignorant is "most ignorant."
Jim Owen has written: 'Mewn Hen Dy' 'The hidden history of the historic fundamentalists, 1933-1948' -- subject(s): Fundamentalism, Historiography, Modernist-fundamentalist controversy, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Historiography