Study guides

☆

Q: Why can a prime number not be abundant?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

21 is a composite number, not a prime, having prime factors 3x7.

No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.

There is no number such as Queen Prime Number.

No, you can easily see that this is an even number, so it is a multiple of 2.2 IS A PRIME NUMBER!!Any number that is a multiple of a prime number is NOT a prime.

13 is a prime number. The only prime factor of a prime number is the number itself.

Related questions

No, all prime numbers are deficient.

No.

No. All prime numbers are deficient.

60 is abundant.

All prime numbers are going to be deficient, because remember that a prime number's only factors are one and itself. To find if its deficient or abundant, you'd add up all of its factors, excluding itself. If its only other factor beside itself is one, that's obviously less than the number, and therefore it will be deficient.

If a number is not abundant it cannot be made abundant!

abundant

No, 29 is not an abundant number.

abundant

67 is an abundant number.

72 is an abundant number.

350 is an abundant number.

People also asked