They are a crude way to represent children's genders which depend on the assumptions that the probabilities are a half for either gender and that the probabilities are independent from one child to another.
In fact, neither assumption is true.
According to recent data, the probabilities of a child's gender is not 0.5 but males are more likely: prob = 0.5169.
Children's genders depend on parental ages and genes and so they are not independent events.
It is not possible to say because the children's genders are not independent.
There is no simple answer to this question because the genders of children depend on the parents genes and age and so are not independent events. Also, the probabilities of the two genders are not equal. Further, some of the children may be identical twins or triplets. Assuming, however, that the genders are independent, the answer is 0.3872, approx.
There is no simple answer to the question because the children's genders are not independent events. They depend on the parents' ages and their genes.However, if you assume that children's genders are independent events then, given that the probability of a girl is approx 0.48.
Yes, it's possible for a mutation in the chromosome to produce otherwise-identical twins with opposite genders. But generally no, identical twins have the same gender. (but fraternal twins have different genders just as often as any siblings)
There is no simple answer to the question because the children's genders are not independent events. They depend on the parents' ages and their genes. Also, the answer will depend on how many children there are in total.
It is not possible to say because the children's genders are not independent.
There is no simple answer to the question because the children's genders are not independent events. They depend on the parents' ages and their genes.If you believe that the children's genders are not independent then you would need to get empirical evidence from all families with four or more children in which the first three children were girls. If there are g families in which the fourth is a girl and b where the fourth is a boy then the required probability is b/(g+b).However, if you assume that the children's genders are independent events then, given that the probability of a boy is approx 0.52, the probability of the fourth child is a boy is 0.52
Elizabeth the First had no children.
If you get a sex change, then yes, it is very possible to change your gender.
She doesnt have any children.
It is inappropriate to marry children regardless of the genders involved.
There is no simple answer to this question because the genders of children depend on the parents genes and age and so are not independent events. Also, the probabilities of the two genders are not equal. Further, some of the children may be identical twins or triplets. Assuming, however, that the genders are independent, the answer is 0.3872, approx.
He had two daughters and one son.
male
No, plants don't have genders.
There is no simple answer to the question because the children's genders are not independent events. They depend on the parents' ages and their genes.However, if you assume that children's genders are independent events then, given that the probability of a girl is approx 0.48.
They have 3 boys and 3 girls.